topical studies about argumentative discourse in context /
First Statement of Responsibility
Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Philadelphia :
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
John Benjamins Publishing Company,
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
[2019]
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
1 online resource.
SERIES
Series Title
Argumentation in context ;
Volume Designation
17
INTERNAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES/INDEXES NOTE
Text of Note
Includes bibliographical references and index.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
Intro; Argumentation in Actual Practice; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; List of contributors; 1. A collection of studies of argumentation in practice; References; 2. Analyzing versus interpreting argumentation; 1. Introduction; 2. Interpreting argumentation; 3. The data; 4. The academic analyst's point of view on the sequence; Contextual elements; A slippery slope argument; 5. The commentators' interpretations of the sequence; 6. Conclusion; References; 3. Television dispositives and the enactment of advocacy arguments; 1. Introduction
Text of Note
2. Advocacy campaigns and the media3. Advocacy argumentation in television campaigns: Towards an analytic framework (1); 4. Television advocacy campaigns as dispositives: Towards an analytic framework (2); 5. Illustration; 6. Conclusion; Acknowledgements; References; 4. Dissociation as strategic maneuvering in spokespersons' argumentative replies at Chinese diplomatic press conferences; 1. Introduction; 2. Different perspectives on dissociation; 3. Institutional preconditions for strategic maneuvering by dissociation in spokespersons' argumentative replies
Text of Note
4. Dissociation as a mode of confrontational strategic maneuvering5. Confrontational maneuvering by dissociation in making a convincing case; 6. Conclusion; Acknowledgements; References; 5. Re-visiting Richard Nixon's "Checkers" speech; 1. Introduction; 2. Background of the speech; 3. The speech achieved overwhelming success; 4. The speech overcame impossible difficulties; 5. But was the speech reasonable?; 6. Checkers reconsidered; 7. Conclusion; References; 6. Strategic ambiguity as an argumentative resource; Introduction; The case study; The ambiguities; The bombing halt
Text of Note
The implications of ad hominem in political campaignsNote; References; 9. Radically reframing the climate debate; References; 10. Prototypical argumentative patterns in activist discourse; 1. Introduction; 2. Corpus and methodology; 3. Argumentative patterns and scientificity in Greenpeace reports; 4. Argumentation in The Detox Catwalk; 4.1 Reconstruction of argumentation in The Detox Catwalk; 5. Conclusion; Acknowledgments; References; 11. "Argumentexturing"; 1. Introduction; 2. A view from learning theory; 3. A view from argumentation theory
Text of Note
The troop announcementGreater reliance on South Vietnam; The gold crisis and the plea for the surtax; The withdrawal statement; Conclusions and implications; References; 7. Argument and ultimate definition in Donald Trump's worldview; Trump's dystopian worldview; Trump's dystopian Twitterverse; Conclusion; Works cited; 8. Understanding abusive argumentum ad hominem through rhetorical context; Introduction; Understanding argumentum ad hominem; Studying Trump's ad hominem in the 2016 presidential election; Ad hominem of character; Ad hominem of personality; Ad hominem of appearance
0
8
8
8
8
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
"Argumentation in Actual Practice contains a collection of topical studies about argumentative discourse in context written by argumentation scholars from a diversity of academic backgrounds. Some contributions provide general perspectives, other contributions deal with specific issues, particular types of argumentative discourse or individual argumentative speech events. The contexts in which argumentation is examined vary from politics and the media to medical, juridical, educational, commercial or military contexts, a specific academic discipline, a special issue or pertain to all kinds of contextualised argumentative discourse. The issues discussed include the interpretation and analysis of argumentation, strategic manoeuvring, argument schemes, the stock issues, the fallacies, the principle of charity and the persuasiveness of argumentative discourse. A common feature is that they are all empirically-oriented and that virtually all of them are strongly concerned with an adequate understanding of contextualised argumentative discourse and the factors that may increase or decrease its reasonableness and effectiveness"--
OTHER EDITION IN ANOTHER MEDIUM
Title
Argumentation in actual practice
International Standard Book Number
9789027204028
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Discourse analysis, Congresses.
Persuasion (Rhetoric), Congresses.
Discourse analysis.
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION
Number
808
.
06/6
Edition
23
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CLASSIFICATION
Class number
P301
.
5
.
P47
PERSONAL NAME - ALTERNATIVE RESPONSIBILITY
Eemeren, F. H. van, (Frans Hendrik),1946-
Garssen, Bart
CORPORATE BODY NAME - PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY
International Society for the Study of Argumentation., Conference(9th :2018 :, Amsterdam, Netherlands)