عنوان

Modern Religiousness :

شماره

LA115645

زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن

انگلیسی

عنوان اصلي

Modern Religiousness :

نام عام مواد

[Article]

ساير اطلاعات عنواني

Extrinsic , Intrinsic or quest?

نام نخستين پديدآور

Boris Kalbheim, Hans-Georg Ziebertz, Ulrich Feeser-Lichterfeld, et al.

محل نشرو پخش و غیره

Leiden

نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره

Brill

متن يادداشت

"The authors examine the religiousness of theology students and students in other disciplines at several German universities in a context of religious differentiation and pluralisation. Based on Batson's model, religiousness is classified into intrinsic, extrinsic and quest orientations. The religiousness of students of theology and students in other fields was found to differ significantly in the three dimensions. Non-theologians tended to ascribe negative value to the extrinsic and the intrinsic dimensions, with the intrinsic dimension being valued more negatively. At the same time they ascribed a slightly positive value to the quest orientation. Theology students valued all three dimensions positively, with especially strong positive value attached to the quest orientation. Using cluster analysis, four types of religiousness were developed: a "conventionally religious" type, a type described as "not religious in a Christian sense", a "questioning and religious" type, and a "strongly religious" type. Theology students fit mainly into the "strongly religious" and "questioning and religious" types. Students in other fields were concentrated in the "conventionally religious" and "not religious in a Christian sense" categories. At the end, the results are discussed from the perspective of practical theology. The authors examine the religiousness of theology students and students in other disciplines at several German universities in a context of religious differentiation and pluralisation. Based on Batson's model, religiousness is classified into intrinsic, extrinsic and quest orientations. The religiousness of students of theology and students in other fields was found to differ significantly in the three dimensions. Non-theologians tended to ascribe negative value to the extrinsic and the intrinsic dimensions, with the intrinsic dimension being valued more negatively. At the same time they ascribed a slightly positive value to the quest orientation. Theology students valued all three dimensions positively, with especially strong positive value attached to the quest orientation. Using cluster analysis, four types of religiousness were developed: a "conventionally religious" type, a type described as "not religious in a Christian sense", a "questioning and religious" type, and a "strongly religious" type. Theology students fit mainly into the "strongly religious" and "questioning and religious" types. Students in other fields were concentrated in the "conventionally religious" and "not religious in a Christian sense" categories. At the end, the results are discussed from the perspective of practical theology."

تاريخ نشر

2001

توصيف ظاهري

5-26

عنوان

Journal of Empirical Theology

شماره جلد

14/1

شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها

1570-9256

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Bernd Schlöder

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Boris Kalbheim

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Hans-Georg Ziebertz

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Ulrich Feeser-Lichterfeld

شماره بازیابی

10.1163/157092501X00019

نام الکترونيکي

فرمت انتشار

p

نوع ماده

[Article]

کد کاربرگه

275578

سطح دسترسي

a

تكميل شده

Y