عنوان
پدید آورنده
موضوع
رده
کتابخانه
محل استقرار
شماره کتابشناسی ملی
شماره
LA116150
زبان اثر
زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن
انگلیسی
عنوان و نام پديدآور
عنوان اصلي
Between "Essential Services" and Culpable Homicide
نام عام مواد
[Article]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Danielle N. Boaz J.D., Ph.D.
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Leiden
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Brill | Nijhoff
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared covid-19-the disease caused by the novel coronavirus-a global pandemic. As this coronavirus spread throughout the world, most countries implemented restrictions on public gatherings that greatly limited religious communities' ability to engage in collective worship. Some religious leaders objected to these regulations, opining that faith would spare their congregants from illness or that their religious freedom is paramount to public health. Meanwhile, growing numbers of covid-19 infections were being traced back to religious leaders or gatherings. This article explores how governments have balanced freedom of worship and public health during the 2020 pandemic. Through the comparison of controversies in South Korea, India, Brazil and the United States, it highlights the paradoxes in debates about whether to hold religious communities accountable for the spread of this highly contagious and deadly disease. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared covid-19-the disease caused by the novel coronavirus-a global pandemic. As this coronavirus spread throughout the world, most countries implemented restrictions on public gatherings that greatly limited religious communities' ability to engage in collective worship. Some religious leaders objected to these regulations, opining that faith would spare their congregants from illness or that their religious freedom is paramount to public health. Meanwhile, growing numbers of covid-19 infections were being traced back to religious leaders or gatherings. This article explores how governments have balanced freedom of worship and public health during the 2020 pandemic. Through the comparison of controversies in South Korea, India, Brazil and the United States, it highlights the paradoxes in debates about whether to hold religious communities accountable for the spread of this highly contagious and deadly disease.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
2020
توصيف ظاهري
129-151
عنوان
Journal of Law, Religion and State
شماره جلد
8/2-3
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
2212-4810
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
Brazil
اصطلاح موضوعی
Comparative Law
اصطلاح موضوعی
Comparative Religion & Religious Studies
اصطلاح موضوعی
coronavirus
اصطلاح موضوعی
essential services
اصطلاح موضوعی
Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
اصطلاح موضوعی
India
اصطلاح موضوعی
International Law
اصطلاح موضوعی
Islamic Law
اصطلاح موضوعی
Middle East and Islamic Studies
اصطلاح موضوعی
Religion & Society
اصطلاح موضوعی
religious freedom
اصطلاح موضوعی
Religious Studies
اصطلاح موضوعی
Social Sciences
اصطلاح موضوعی
South Korea
اصطلاح موضوعی
United States
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Danielle N. Boaz J.D., Ph.D.
شماره دستیابی
شماره بازیابی
10.1163/22124810-2020008
دسترسی و محل الکترونیکی
نام الکترونيکي
مطالعه متن کتاب وضعیت انتشار
فرمت انتشار
p
اطلاعات رکورد کتابشناسی
نوع ماده
[Article]
کد کاربرگه
275578
اطلاعات دسترسی رکورد
سطح دسترسي
a
تكميل شده
Y
